Hmmmm
Can we take God's grace too far? Over the last few years I have been learning a lot about how God's grace covers all and because of this we can experience true freedom in Christ. How refreshing to know that I dont have to follow all the rules and regulations put on me by man. But can I take that too far? In 1 Corinthians 5:1-2 Paul calls the Corinthian church on an issue. "It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and of a kind that does not occur even among pagans: A man has his father's wife. And you are proud! Shouldn't you rather have been filled with grief and have put out of your fellowship the man who did this?"
So this is an extreme case, but what is happening is that the church was so proud of how they could do anything and be covered by God's grace! It sounds ludicrous at first but when I think about it I have to wonder if some of us (mainly myself) may be on the same track. We are a group who are proud of the fact that we can drink, gamble a little etc.(I am not taking a personal shot at anyone here,I personally enjoy a good drink now and again and I look forward to poker nights) I am not saying that there is anything wrong with these actions in and of themselves but can they become destructive? What kind of example do I set for someone who perhaps has a drinking problem? Do I let them destroy themselves and their families because I am ok with having a drink now and again? Am I proud that I dont have to live by the rules that so many other churches follow, to the point of thinking that I am better than them. I know I catch myself often on this. Am I becoming legalistic about legalism?
This is the point in my rant where I expect many of you readers to bombard me with arguments and please go ahead. I am just thinking and processing things. Im not saying that I am right, just curious.
The second thing that I have been thinking through is kind of on the same level. I know that we are suppose to let go of issues in our lives and let God handle them but at what point do we actually have to make a decision and do something? Yup I said DO SOMTHING. Let me give you an example of what I am talking about. Lets say I have an addiction to alcohol ( we always pick on the poor addicts on this one)Now I pray and ask God to take this away as I know that I can't do it on my own. Now I have a choice. I can go to AA and learn to avoid situations that I know will tempt me or I can continue on with my same life style and say "hey I prayed so if I get drunk and screw my family over its God's fault". Both of those options involve DOING SOMETHING. Maybe that is not a great example. Here's another. What if I have a bum liver and the doctor says I need a transplant. I can give it to God and just sit at home hoping that he will heal me or I can get on the transplant list and pray that God will heal me through the hands of a professional. Does that mean that I didnt just let God have it? I know that there has to be a balance between doing and letting go. Or maybe MY God is just not powerful enough.Hmmmm.
I feel that this whole "just let God have it" has become a touchy subject for many people that I am in contact with. I was recently talking to a friend who mentioned that they have become afraid to pray in public for fear that they use the wrong words when they pray and will then be condemned. This friend said that it has actually happened when they said something the wrong way and they were confronted. Well that would never happen in our church. Oh wait this friend happends to be a member of the same church as me. Tell me if this sounds familiar "Dear God please give me strength to overcome..." No wait we are suppose to say " Dear God I ask that in your strength you would overcome..." If we are admitting that we need God's help does it really matter what wording we use? Isnt that a little legalistic. I dont believe that we are to come to God with a guarded heart. When we pray we should be able to pour out our heart to our creator. He knows what we are thinking even if our words are wrong.
Anyways this has just been a little of me trying to figure out somethings. Im sorry if none of it made any sense. I am still trying to sort it out in my own mind. Thanks for letting me get this stuff out there. I welcome your comments.
So this is an extreme case, but what is happening is that the church was so proud of how they could do anything and be covered by God's grace! It sounds ludicrous at first but when I think about it I have to wonder if some of us (mainly myself) may be on the same track. We are a group who are proud of the fact that we can drink, gamble a little etc.(I am not taking a personal shot at anyone here,I personally enjoy a good drink now and again and I look forward to poker nights) I am not saying that there is anything wrong with these actions in and of themselves but can they become destructive? What kind of example do I set for someone who perhaps has a drinking problem? Do I let them destroy themselves and their families because I am ok with having a drink now and again? Am I proud that I dont have to live by the rules that so many other churches follow, to the point of thinking that I am better than them. I know I catch myself often on this. Am I becoming legalistic about legalism?
This is the point in my rant where I expect many of you readers to bombard me with arguments and please go ahead. I am just thinking and processing things. Im not saying that I am right, just curious.
The second thing that I have been thinking through is kind of on the same level. I know that we are suppose to let go of issues in our lives and let God handle them but at what point do we actually have to make a decision and do something? Yup I said DO SOMTHING. Let me give you an example of what I am talking about. Lets say I have an addiction to alcohol ( we always pick on the poor addicts on this one)Now I pray and ask God to take this away as I know that I can't do it on my own. Now I have a choice. I can go to AA and learn to avoid situations that I know will tempt me or I can continue on with my same life style and say "hey I prayed so if I get drunk and screw my family over its God's fault". Both of those options involve DOING SOMETHING. Maybe that is not a great example. Here's another. What if I have a bum liver and the doctor says I need a transplant. I can give it to God and just sit at home hoping that he will heal me or I can get on the transplant list and pray that God will heal me through the hands of a professional. Does that mean that I didnt just let God have it? I know that there has to be a balance between doing and letting go. Or maybe MY God is just not powerful enough.Hmmmm.
I feel that this whole "just let God have it" has become a touchy subject for many people that I am in contact with. I was recently talking to a friend who mentioned that they have become afraid to pray in public for fear that they use the wrong words when they pray and will then be condemned. This friend said that it has actually happened when they said something the wrong way and they were confronted. Well that would never happen in our church. Oh wait this friend happends to be a member of the same church as me. Tell me if this sounds familiar "Dear God please give me strength to overcome..." No wait we are suppose to say " Dear God I ask that in your strength you would overcome..." If we are admitting that we need God's help does it really matter what wording we use? Isnt that a little legalistic. I dont believe that we are to come to God with a guarded heart. When we pray we should be able to pour out our heart to our creator. He knows what we are thinking even if our words are wrong.
Anyways this has just been a little of me trying to figure out somethings. Im sorry if none of it made any sense. I am still trying to sort it out in my own mind. Thanks for letting me get this stuff out there. I welcome your comments.